Tag: ObesityMedicine

Weight Loss Surgery Options for Obesity Explained

On By Dr. Scott RennieIn Weight Loss & Metabolic HealthLeave a comment

Weight loss surgery, also called bariatric or metabolic surgery, is one of the most effective treatments available for severe obesity. Gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy are safer now than they have ever been, and demand keeps climbing. Surgery carries risk and requires a long-term commitment, and both belong in the conversation from the first visit.

Obesity affects more than 100 million U.S. adults, roughly 40.3% of the adult population, with 9.7% in the severe range (NCHS, NHANES August 2021 to August 2023). Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and early death all track with excess weight. Lifestyle programs and medications help, and for many patients the results don’t hold. That is the gap surgery fills. The Swedish Obese Subjects study followed patients for over a decade and found surgery produced durable weight loss and lower mortality (Sjöström et al., NEJM, 2007), and a retrospective cohort found a 40% reduction in all-cause mortality after gastric bypass (Adams et al., NEJM, 2007).

So who qualifies? Under the 2022 ASMBS and IFSO guidelines, surgery is recommended for people with BMI over 35 regardless of comorbidity, and for BMI 30 to 34.9 in patients with metabolic disease that has not responded to medical therapy (Eisenberg et al., Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2022). That is a meaningful loosening from the 1991 NIH thresholds most clinicians still carry in their heads. There is no strict age cutoff, though surgeons approach adolescents and older adults with extra care.

Before surgery, patients go through a thorough workup: nutrition and psychology evaluations, cardiac and pulmonary assessment, sometimes a sleep study and endoscopy. Smoking cessation is required. Most insurers still ask for documentation of six months of supervised weight management, a requirement with no good evidence behind it that delays care for people who need it. That time does get used for preparation and education, which is the one argument in its favor.

Several procedures are available. Sleeve gastrectomy is the most common worldwide. About 80% of the stomach is removed, limiting intake and changing hunger hormones. Patients typically lose 55 to 60% of excess weight. The operation is shorter than bypass and hospital stays run one to two days. Worsening reflux is the main downside (Peterli et al., JAMA, 2018).

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has decades of long-term data behind it. A small pouch connects to the small intestine, bypassing part of the digestive tract. Average weight loss runs 60 to 70% of excess weight, diabetes remission rates are high, and reflux often improves. Risks include vitamin deficiencies, marginal ulcers, and internal hernias (Higa et al., Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2011).

One anastomosis gastric bypass simplifies the technique and shows promising results for weight and comorbidities, with higher risk of bile reflux and deficiencies. Duodenal switch and SADI combine a sleeve with intestinal rerouting. These are the most powerful options for diabetes remission and weight loss and they demand the most careful long-term monitoring. Gastric banding is now rare. It once looked appealing because it was reversible and low-risk, and the weight loss proved modest while long-term reoperation rates ran high (Genco et al., Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2016).

The randomized evidence is strong. Trials by Mingrone, Schauer, and Ikramuddin all demonstrated higher diabetes remission with surgery than with medical therapy alone, and the Schauer and Mingrone cohorts held those differences out to five and ten years (Schauer et al., NEJM, 2012 and 2017; Mingrone et al., Lancet, 2015 and 2021; Ikramuddin et al., JAMA, 2018).

Weight regain happens. About one in five patients regains some weight after bypass, from changes in anatomy or lapses in eating and activity. Surgeons can offer revision: re-sleeving, converting sleeve to bypass, or tightening pouches. These get tailored to the individual.

Long-term success depends on follow-up. Regular labs, nutrition counseling, ongoing team support. Lifelong vitamin and mineral supplementation is required rather than optional. Behavioral support matters, because habits carry as much weight as anatomy over years.

Weight loss surgery is one of the most powerful tools we have for a disease that is otherwise progressive and difficult to manage. With careful preparation, modern technique, and sustained follow-up, patients see improvements in weight, health, and quality of life that few other interventions produce.

Scott Rennie, D.O.

References:

1. National Center for Health Statistics. Prevalence of Overweight, Obesity, and Severe Obesity Among Adults Age 20 and Older: United States, August 2021–August 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/obesity-adult-17-18/obesity-adult.htm

2. Sjöström L, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741-752. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17715408/

3. Adams TD, et al. Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):753-761. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17715409/

4. Eisenberg D, et al. 2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022;18(12):1345-1356. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36280539/

5. Schauer PR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1567-1576; and N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641-651.

6. Mingrone G, et al. Lancet. 2015;386(9997):964-973; and Lancet. 2021;397(10271):293-304.

7. Ikramuddin S, et al. JAMA. 2018;319(3):266-278.

8. Peterli R, et al. Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss in Patients With Morbid Obesity: The SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255-265. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29340679/

9. Higa K, et al. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(4):516-525.

10. Genco A, et al. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(10):1783-1788.

Board Certified in Obesity Medicine and Family Medicine

This blog is for educational purposes only and does not constitute individual medical advice. Always consult your own physician before making changes to your health, medications, or treatment plan.

Why Stress Makes You Hungry: The Link to Obesity

On By Dr. Scott RennieIn Weight Loss & Metabolic HealthLeave a comment

One of the harder conversations I have with patients carrying overweight and obesity is about stress and eating. People tell me they reach for snacks when they are anxious or exhausted. That part is familiar to everyone. What is less obvious is how thoroughly stress rewrites the biology of appetite, and how far past willpower the problem sits.

Under ordinary circumstances, hunger runs on homeostatic systems responding to real energy needs. Stress shifts that balance toward non-homeostatic eating, meaning eating driven by something other than fuel. Cortisol rises. Brain reward pathways get stimulated. Cravings sharpen for calorie-dense, highly processed food. Over time the pattern feeds visceral fat gain and insulin resistance (Adam & Epel, Physiol Behav, 2007).

The affect regulation model explains the loop. Stress raises negative emotion, anxiety, sadness, tension. Eating reduces those feelings briefly. That behavior can escalate into binge episodes defined by loss of control and large quantities of food, and binge eating then reinforces itself psychologically and biologically (Heatherton & Baumeister, Psychol Bull, 1991; Telch & Agras, Int J Eat Disord, 1996). Cortisol rises further, abdominal fat increases, glucose spikes worsen insulin resistance.

Sleep and physical activity sit on top of this. Poor sleep increases cravings and erodes impulse control. Exercise works the other way, spending energy while lowering stress and improving mood, and patients who increase activity often find cravings less overwhelming. Food type matters too. Ultra-processed products are engineered to be hyper-palatable and push reward systems harder than whole foods do. Sugary drinks and fructose-rich snacks impair satiety and drive fat storage.

Identifying stress eating often starts with a plain question. I ask patients whether they feel they eat more than the people around them, or whether they ever feel out of control around food. Those two questions surface patterns people have struggled to put into words. Catching it early makes everything downstream more effective.

Patients with stress eating or binge eating disorder face additional obstacles. They drop out of weight programs at higher rates, regain faster, and need strategies reaching past diet and exercise. Emotional regulation, awareness of hunger and fullness cues, and methods for reducing stress responses all become part of the treatment rather than adjuncts to it. Emotion regulation deficits are well documented in binge eating disorder specifically (Czaja, Rief & Hilbert, Int J Eat Disord, 2009).

Mindfulness has trial support. The SHINE study found that a mindfulness-based intervention reduced reward-driven eating and improved fasting glucose in adults with obesity, with modest but real weight change and without strict calorie counting (Daubenmier et al., Obesity, 2016; Mason et al., J Behav Med, 2016). Cognitive behavioral therapy is the other well-supported tool, particularly for binge eating disorder. Both give patients skills for managing stress that don’t route through food.

Medication has a role. Lisdexamfetamine is FDA-approved for moderate to severe binge eating disorder. SSRIs and topiramate get used in selected cases. Continuous glucose monitoring has been explored as a way to show patients how binge episodes register physiologically in real time, and the work so far is early and promising rather than established (Presseller et al., Int J Eat Disord, 2024). Bariatric surgery remains an option, though outcomes may be less favorable when binge behaviors haven’t been addressed first.

Stress eating is biology, psychology, and environment colliding in ways that push people toward overeating, and weak discipline explains none of it. Naming it and treating both the triggers and the physiology is what breaks the cycle. Treatment combining stress management, emotional regulation, and behavioral support makes lasting change realistic.

Scott Rennie, D.O.

References:

1. Adam TC, Epel ES. Stress, eating and the reward system. Physiol Behav. 2007;91(4):449-458. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17543357/

2. Heatherton TF, Baumeister RF. Binge eating as escape from self-awareness. Psychol Bull. 1991;110(1):86-108. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1891520/

3. Telch CF, Agras WS. Do emotional states influence binge eating in the obese? Int J Eat Disord. 1996;20(3):271-279. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8912039/

4. Czaja J, Rief W, Hilbert A. Emotion regulation and binge eating in children. Int J Eat Disord. 2009;42(4):356-362. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19040265/

5. Daubenmier J, et al. Effects of a mindfulness-based weight loss intervention in adults with obesity: A randomized clinical trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(4):794-804. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26955895/

6. Mason AE, et al. Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on mindful eating, sweets consumption, and fasting glucose levels in obese adults. J Behav Med. 2016;39(2):201-213. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26563148/

7. Presseller EK, et al. Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Passively Classify Naturalistic Binge Eating and Vomiting Among Adults With Binge-Spectrum Eating Disorders: A Preliminary Investigation. Int J Eat Disord. 2024. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24266

Board Certified in Obesity Medicine and Family Medicine

This blog is for educational purposes only and does not constitute individual medical advice. Always consult your own physician before making changes to your health, medications, or treatment plan.

Weight Loss Drug Side Effects and How Common They Are

On By Dr. Scott RennieIn Weight Loss & Metabolic HealthLeave a comment

As more patients start anti-obesity medications, the question that comes up most is about side effects. These drugs are powerful tools for weight loss and metabolic health. They aren’t without risk. Knowing what to expect and how to manage it often decides whether someone stays on treatment or quits in month two.

Gastrointestinal effects are the ones I hear about most. Nausea leads the list. In STEP 1, which studied semaglutide 2.4 mg in adults without diabetes, nausea affected 44.2% of participants against 17.4% on placebo (Wilding et al., NEJM, 2021). In SCALE, the corresponding trial of liraglutide 3.0 mg, nausea affected 40.2% versus 14.7% on placebo (Pi-Sunyer et al., NEJM, 2015). Those two trials are the source of most of the numbers in this post, and they studied different drugs. Smaller meals, avoiding high-fat food, and slow dose titration usually get patients through it.

Constipation and diarrhea both follow the same pattern, common early and improving with time. Hydration, added fiber, and sometimes a stool softener handle most constipation. Diarrhea occasionally warrants a dose adjustment. Rarely, delayed gastric emptying can progress toward obstruction, which presents as bloating, pain, and vomiting and needs prompt evaluation.

Pancreatitis is uncommon and serious. In SCALE, acute pancreatitis occurred in a small number of liraglutide patients and none on placebo, at an incidence around 0.3%. Severe abdominal pain radiating to the back with nausea and vomiting should trigger immediate discontinuation and workup.

Gallbladder disease is a real risk and it is mostly a consequence of the weight loss itself. In SCALE, cholelithiasis occurred in 1.5% of liraglutide patients versus 1.1% on placebo, and acute cholecystitis in 0.8% versus 0.4%. Rapid weight loss and changes in bile concentration are the likely mechanism, which means the risk travels with any effective therapy rather than with this drug class specifically.

Hypoglycemia is uncommon with GLP-1 receptor agonists used alone in patients without diabetes, because these drugs stimulate insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent way. Risk climbs sharply in combination with insulin or a sulfonylurea. That combination is where monitoring and dose adjustment of the background agent become necessary, and it is worth addressing before starting rather than after the first low reading.

Thyroid cancer risk is rare and gets asked about constantly. GLP-1 receptor agonists carry a boxed warning for medullary thyroid carcinoma based on rodent C-cell tumor data, and they are contraindicated in anyone with a personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Human data haven’t established a causal link, and a widely publicized French case-control study reporting an association drew substantial methodological criticism in the same journal (Bezin et al., Diabetes Care, 2023). I tell patients the contraindication is firm and the population-level risk remains unproven.

Kidney injury is rare and usually a consequence of dehydration after vomiting or diarrhea rather than a direct drug effect. Pushing fluids during dose escalation is an easy preventive step.

Heart rate increases are reported as well. Resting heart rate can rise by roughly one to four beats per minute on semaglutide or tirzepatide. Palpitations should always be reported.

Pregnancy deserves its own conversation. These medications aren’t recommended during pregnancy, and semaglutide should be stopped at least two months before conception. There is also an interaction with oral contraceptives, since delayed gastric emptying affects absorption. For tirzepatide, patients on oral contraceptives should switch to a non-oral method or add a barrier method for four weeks after starting and for four weeks after each dose increase.

Injection site reactions occur in a small percentage of patients, usually three to five percent. Redness, swelling, and itching are the usual complaints, and rotating sites with good technique resolves most of it.

None of this means patients should avoid these medications. Awareness and early management are what keep people on treatment. I often tell patients to call me if nausea or constipation is interfering with their day-to-day life rather than waiting for the next follow-up. Small changes in dosing or diet usually make the drug tolerable again.

Anti-obesity medications work, and they need thoughtful monitoring. With open communication, most side effects are manageable and most patients stay on track.

Scott Rennie, D.O.

References:

1. Wilding JPH, et al. Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity (STEP 1). N Engl J Med. 2021;384(11):989-1002. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33567185/

2. Pi-Sunyer X, et al. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 3.0 mg of Liraglutide in Weight Management (SCALE). N Engl J Med. 2015;373(1):11-22. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26132939/

3. Bezin J, et al. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and the Risk of Thyroid Cancer. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(2):384-390. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36356111/

Board Certified in Obesity Medicine and Family Medicine

This blog is for educational purposes only and does not constitute individual medical advice. Always consult your own physician before making changes to your health, medications, or treatment plan.

New Obesity Drugs Beyond Ozempic and Zepbound Explained

On By Dr. Scott RennieIn Weight Loss & Metabolic HealthLeave a comment

Obesity treatment is shifting fast. For years the standard toolkit was lifestyle counseling plus a handful of older medications. New drug classes now target the actual biology of the disease: hormonal signaling, metabolic rate, body composition. Three groups matter most right now. Nutrient-stimulated hormone-based therapies. Oral small molecule receptor agonists. And activin receptor pathway inhibitors.

NuSHs mimic or amplify the body’s own hormonal response to food. GLP-1 increases satiety, slows gastric emptying, and supports insulin secretion (Wilding et al., N Engl J Med, 2021). GIP regulates fat metabolism and glucose response (Frías et al., N Engl J Med, 2021). Amylin, co-secreted with insulin, works as its own satiety signal (Dehestani et al., J Obes Metab Syndr, 2021). PYY reduces appetite and energy intake (Schmidt et al., Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 2014). Oxyntomodulin reduces intake too, and also raises energy expenditure (Wynne et al., Int J Obes, 2006).

Several drugs in this class are already in trials, and CagriSema pairs an amylin analogue with a GLP-1 receptor agonist, reducing body weight by 17.1 percent in 20 weeks in a Phase 1b trial, not Phase 3 (Enebo et al., Lancet, 2021). Survodutide, a GLP-1 and glucagon receptor agonist, produced weight loss of up to 18.7 percent over 46 weeks (Le Roux et al., Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2024). Retatrutide, which hits GIP, GLP-1, and glucagon receptors together, produced a 24.2 percent reduction over 48 weeks in Phase 2 testing. Women lost about 28.5 percent of body weight, men about 21.9 percent (Jastreboff et al., N Engl J Med, 2023). Oral semaglutide at 50 mg reached 17.4 percent weight loss at 68 weeks, with 37 percent of participants losing more than a fifth of their body weight (Knop et al., Lancet, 2023). Mari-tide is still in Phase 2, with promising early results.

Small molecule receptor agonists are the other track, and their edge is simple: a pill instead of a needle. Orforglipron produced about 14.7 percent weight loss at 36 weeks, in range with the injectables (Wharton et al., N Engl J Med, 2023). Danuglipron is behind it. Early Phase 2 data, in patients with type 2 diabetes rather than obesity specifically, showed reduced appetite alongside improved glucose and weight outcomes (Saxena et al., Diabetes Obes Metab, 2023). Whether that holds up in an obesity-only population is still unclear.

Activin receptor pathway inhibitors take a different approach. They target pathways that preserve muscle while fat comes off, since traditional weight loss burns muscle right along with fat. These drugs try to change that ratio (Heymsfield et al., JAMA Netw Open, 2021).

Bimagrumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks the activin type II receptor, reduced fat mass by 20.5 percent while increasing lean mass by 3.6 percent over 48 weeks in trials. Combine it with a GLP-1 drug like semaglutide or tirzepatide and the body-composition effect gets stronger still. Taldefgrobep, a myostatin inhibitor originally developed for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, is now being tested for obesity. SRK-439 is another myostatin-targeting antibody in development, aimed at fat loss without the lean-mass cost.

What sets these treatments apart is what the weight loss is made of: more muscle retained, metabolic markers that move too, alongside the pounds lost. That’s a real shift, for patients who may get more durable results and fewer complications, and for clinicians who get more tools to match therapy to the person in front of them.

Scott Rennie, D.O.

References:

Wilding JPH, et al. Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:989-1002. PMID 33567185. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33567185/

Frías JP, et al. Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide Once Weekly in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (SURPASS-2). N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID 34170647. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34170647/

Dehestani B, Stratford NR, le Roux CW. Amylin as a Future Obesity Treatment. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2021;30(4):320-325. PMID 34929674. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34929674/

Schmidt JB, Gregersen NT, Pedersen SD, et al. Effects of PYY3-36 and GLP-1 on energy intake, energy expenditure, and appetite in overweight men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;306(11):E1248-56. PMID 24735885. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24735885/

Wynne K, Park AJ, Small CJ, et al. Oxyntomodulin increases energy expenditure in addition to decreasing energy intake in overweight and obese humans: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006;30(12):1729-1736. PMID 16619056. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16619056/

Enebo LB, Berthelsen KK, Kankam M, et al. Lancet. 2021;397:1736-1748. Phase 1b trial. PMID 33894838. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33894838/

Le Roux CW, et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024;12:162-173. PMID 38330987. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38330987/

Jastreboff AM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:514-526. PMID 37366315. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37366315/

Knop FK, et al. Lancet. 2023 (OASIS 1). PMID 37385278. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37385278/

Wharton S, Blevins T, Connery L, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:877-888. PMID 37351564. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37351564/

Saxena AR, Frias JP, Brown LS, et al. Tolerability, safety and pharmacodynamics of oral, small-molecule GLP-1 receptor agonist danuglipron for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023. PMID 37311722. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37311722/

Heymsfield SB, Coleman LA, Miller R, et al. Effect of Bimagrumab vs Placebo on Body Fat Mass Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(1):e2033457. PMID 33439265. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33439265/

Board Certified in Obesity Medicine and Family Medicine

This blog is for educational purposes only and does not constitute individual medical advice. Always consult your own physician before making changes to your health, medications, or treatment plan.