Tag: Childhood Obesity Prevention

Food Addiction and Obesity: How the Brain Is Involved

On By Dr. Scott RennieIn Weight Loss & Metabolic HealthLeave a comment

The human brain gets described as an engineering marvel. Like any product, it ships with vulnerabilities. Evolution built a system for surviving scarcity, and we now run that system in an environment of constant stimulation and engineered food. The mismatch explains a great deal about why obesity and addiction share so much ground.

One useful way to frame it is in terms of failure modes. Sometimes the design itself creates the problem. Sometimes development goes off track. And sometimes a perfectly good brain breaks down under conditions no brain was built for.

Take the design. We evolved to crave calorie-dense food because it was scarce and it kept us alive. Sugar and fat are now everywhere, and those old drives get hijacked. Food companies understand how to exploit them, the same way addictive substances exploit the same reward circuitry. The biology has not changed. The environment has.

Development matters too. Prenatal nutrition, early childhood adversity, and other disruptions shape how the brain handles reward and stress. Analysis of roughly 2,700 children in the NIH-funded ABCD Study found that higher BMI was associated with thinner cortex, particularly in prefrontal regions, and with lower working memory on list-sorting tasks (Laurent et al., 2020). Brain development itself appears alterable in the setting of poor diet and excess weight.

Then there are the extreme conditions. Trauma, chronic stress, and social adversity overwhelm coping systems, and food and drugs become the fallback. Calling that a failure of willpower misses what is happening. The brain is adapting, badly, to circumstances it can’t otherwise handle. It also helps explain why obesity and addiction cluster in groups facing economic hardship and unstable environments.

Dopamine sits at the center of both. Dopamine does more than produce pleasure. It teaches the brain what to attend to and what to repeat. Eat sugar, dopamine surges, the brain takes note. Use a drug, same signal. With repeated exposure, dopamine receptors downregulate (Volkow et al., 2013). Tolerance builds. Soon more sugar or more drug is needed to reach baseline.

Refined sugar is unusually effective in this loop. It spikes glucose fast, drives dopamine release, and slips past satiety signaling. Animal studies show sugar producing binge-like intake patterns and withdrawal signs on removal (Avena et al., Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2008). In humans, high sugar intake has been linked to memory problems, greater inflammation, and impaired hippocampal function (Kendig, Appetite, 2014). Which is why cutting sugar feels less like breaking a habit and more like breaking an addiction.

So what helps? Supporting the brain at each stage. Protecting the developing brain through prenatal nutrition and limiting early sugar exposure. Teaching children coping skills, protecting sleep, and building activity, all of which strengthen the prefrontal cortex that reins in impulse. Reducing ultra-processed food at home and in schools.

Medications now target this signaling directly. GLP-1 receptor agonists act on satiety hormones in the gut and on brain pathways that regulate appetite. They reset the system rather than substituting for resolve.

Research is moving toward brain-based interventions: neurofeedback, brain stimulation, digital tools that reinforce healthier behavior in real time. The underlying message has not changed. Obesity and addiction are brain-based conditions shaped by biology, environment, and lived experience. Recognizing that changes how we treat and support the people in front of us, without letting anyone off the hook for their own care.

Scott Rennie, D.O.

References:

1. Laurent JS, et al. Associations Among Body Mass Index, Cortical Thickness, and Executive Function in Children. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(2):170-177. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31816020/

2. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Tomasi D, Baler RD. Obesity and addiction: neurobiological overlaps. Obes Rev. 2013;14(1):2-18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23016694/

3. Avena NM, Rada P, Hoebel BG. Evidence for sugar addiction: behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(1):20-39. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17617461/

4. Kendig MD. Cognitive and behavioural effects of sugar consumption in rodents: a review. Appetite. 2014;80:41-54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24816323/

Board Certified in Obesity Medicine and Family Medicine

This blog is for educational purposes only and does not constitute individual medical advice. Always consult your own physician before making changes to your health, medications, or treatment plan.

Childhood Food Insecurity: What Doctors and Families Can Do

On By Dr. Scott RennieIn Other Diseases and ConditionsLeave a comment

Food insecurity means the lack of consistent access to enough food for a healthy, active life. Hunger is part of it. The rest reaches into development, school performance, behavior, and long-term health, and millions of children in this country live inside it.

In pediatrics it surfaces quietly. A child who can’t concentrate at school. A family that skips meals at the end of the month. A growth curve that looks off and doesn’t fit the usual explanations. Treating it as a clinical problem rather than a social one is where the work starts.

The scope is wide. In 2024, 13.7% of U.S. households experienced food insecurity at some point during the year, and among households with children the figure was 18.4% (1). That is up sharply from the 10.5% recorded in 2020. Children carry the heaviest burden. The literature links food insecurity to iron-deficiency anemia, delayed motor and cognitive development, poor school performance, and behavioral problems including depression and inattention (Cook et al., J Nutr, 2004; Casey et al., Pediatrics, 2006).

Food insecurity and obesity travel together, which surprises most parents. Economic pressure pushes families toward calorie-dense, low-cost food. Scarcity itself can trigger binge eating when food becomes available. Stress and parenting under pressure add another layer. Children get urged to clean their plates, or food becomes the tool for soothing. Children aged 10 to 15 in food-insecure households are more likely to carry higher BMI and adiposity (Tester et al., Curr Obes Rep, 2020).

Geography tells its own story. The Southeastern U.S. carries some of the highest rates of both food insecurity and childhood obesity. Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, and Texas rank among the hardest hit for food insecurity. Mississippi, West Virginia, Kentucky, Alabama, and Oklahoma consistently report the highest pediatric obesity rates. The overlap is no coincidence. Rural areas, tribal lands, and parts of Appalachia function as food deserts, where grocery stores are scarce and convenience stores and fast food fill the gap. Poverty and underinvestment in health infrastructure compound it.

So how do we find it? Most pediatric settings use the Hunger Vital Sign, a two-question screener drawn from the USDA’s 18-item scale and endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Against the full scale it runs 97% sensitive and 83% specific (Hager et al., Pediatrics, 2010; AAP Council on Community Pediatrics, Pediatrics, 2015). It asks families to respond to two statements:

“We worried whether our food would run out before we got money to buy more.”

“The food we bought just didn’t last, and we didn’t have money to get more.”

An answer of “often true” or “sometimes true” to either one signals risk. It is short, it embeds cleanly in an EMR, and it has been validated across languages. Longer tools exist, including the USDA’s full 18-item module, its 6-item short form, and the 9-item youth survey, but the time cost usually rules them out.

Screening is harder to implement than it sounds. Time, competing priorities, and plain discomfort discussing money are real barriers. Self-administered forms, EMR prompts, and universal framing all help. Telling every family “we ask everyone about food, because it’s central to health” takes the sting out of the question. When a screen comes back positive, the referral pathway has to already exist, whether that means SNAP and WIC enrollment, food pantries, or school meal programs.

Federal nutrition programs remain the strongest safety net. SNAP provides grocery support. WIC offers food vouchers, nutrition education, and breastfeeding support. The National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs cover the school year, and the Summer Food Service Program covers the gap when school is out. The evidence doesn’t support the worry that these programs worsen obesity risk. WIC participation tracked with a decline in obesity among children aged 2 to 4 across 2010 to 2016 (Pan et al., MMWR, 2019). Stable SNAP benefits reduce the time children spend with obesity compared with non-participants (Au et al., J Nutr, 2019).

For clinicians the task splits in two: identify and connect. Screening is the first half. The impact comes from linking families to something real, which might mean a referral list built into the EMR, a relationship with a local enrollment center, or a standing partnership with a community food bank. Even asking “would it help if I connected you with resources that provide healthy food?” moves something.

Food insecurity is a health problem, and it shows up in front of us constantly. Naming it, screening for it, and acting on it protects children from consequences that reach a long way forward.

Scott Rennie, D.O.

References:

1. Rabbitt MP, et al. Household Food Security in the United States in 2024. USDA Economic Research Service, ERR-358, December 2025. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details?pubid=113622

2. Cook JT, et al. Food insecurity is associated with adverse health outcomes among human infants and toddlers. J Nutr. 2004;134(6):1432-1438. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15173408/

3. Casey PH, et al. Child health-related quality of life and household food security. Pediatrics. 2006;118(5):e1406-e1413. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17079542/

4. Hager ER, et al. Development and validity of a 2-item screen to identify families at risk for food insecurity. Pediatrics. 2010;126(1):e26-e32. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20595453/

5. Council on Community Pediatrics, Committee on Nutrition. Promoting Food Security for All Children. Pediatrics. 2015;136(5):e1431-e1438. Reaffirmed 2021. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/136/5/e1431/33896/

6. Tester JM, Rosas LG, Leung CW. Food Insecurity and Pediatric Obesity. Curr Obes Rep. 2020;9(4):562-570.

7. Au LE, et al. J Nutr. 2019;149(9):1642-1650.

8. Pan L, et al. Trends in Obesity Among Participants Aged 2 to 4 Years in WIC, United States, 2010 to 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(45):1057-1061. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/68/wr/mm6845a2.htm

Board Certified in Obesity Medicine and Family Medicine

This blog is for educational purposes only and does not constitute individual medical advice. Always consult your own physician before making changes to your health, medications, or treatment plan.